Top Stories

SECTIONS

ARCHIVE

Visions for Tomorrow: How You Can Save The World, presented by SCI FI
About | Contributor's Bios | All Posts | RSS Feed

Tomorrow-Matters-jamais-cascio.jpg When the world seems to be falling down all around us, can we afford to spend our time thinking about the future?

In the midst of ongoing wars, accelerating economic collapse, and cascading environmental ruin, it’s easy to dismiss futurism as self-indulgence, a superficial pastime devoted to spotting the next hot gizmo or telling us all how some coming development changes everything. What really matters is the here-and-now. Serious people know that thinking about the future is frivolous; anyone (or any business) not focusing laser-like on the problems of today is wasting time and money. Right?

Wrong.

Thinking about the future is fundamentally important to dealing with the challenges of today. In order to confront these problems successfully, we have to think carefully about the implications and results of the steps we might take, not just in the immediate moment, but as conditions continue to evolve. As we’ve seen time and again, it’s all too easy for actions that seem reflexively correct to lead to far greater crises down the road.

Futurism — or, as I prefer to articulate it, structured thinking about the future — is a means of putting both the problems we face today and the solutions we might try in a larger context. It does so in three key ways:

  • It expands our understanding of the scope of the situation. How do these various problems connect to each other? Are there underlying similarities? How would the outcomes that we fear would arise from problem X affect the course of problem Z? Would the steps we want to take in one arena positively or negatively affect outcomes in another situation?

Now, to be sure, good present-focused analysis will give you much of this, too. And doing this sort of thinking about a problem is far, far better than the “ooh shiny!/ooh scary!” model we seem to reflexively use, especially in major crises. But futurism does more.

  • It expands our understanding of the horizon of the situation. Not just how does this affect us now, but how would this affect us over time? In parallel, it allows us to think through what happens with different kinds of solutions we may want to use to deal with a problem. What’s the potential for undesirable consequences? What kind of conditions result after this “solves” the problem?

Again, you might say, “this isn’t futurism, it’s simply responsible thinking” — again, sorely lacking in much of our current discourse. But you might notice that conventional analysis that looks at horizon issues (implications, blowback, and the like) rarely gets combined with conventional analysis that looks at scope issues (relationships, reinforcement, interdependencies). Carrying off that kind of combination is hard to do, and especially hard to do well.

That’s why few of the discussions of (for example) the current global financial meltdown will include more than a cursory reference to energy (and even there, will almost entirely focus on oil), a glance at demographics (and only in regards to pensions and, in the US, Social Security), or anything at all about climate disruption, migration patterns, and the role of participatory technologies. Yet all of these issues both helped to create the conditions that made the financial panic possible, and will shape both the kinds of responses we can undertake and how well those responses will work.

But futurism has one more, critical, trick up its sleeve:

  • It expands our understanding of the kind of world we want. By bringing into focus both the scope of connections among issues, and the potential impacts and implications on the horizon, futures thinking allows us to begin to see the path we’d need to take to get to a better world — or, at minimum, the paths we need to avoid in order to forestall a worsening situation. Futurism, structured thinking about the future, clarifies the responsibility and capacity we have to create a tomorrow worth living in.

Heady stuff. And a bit presumptuous, too — how can we think that we can see the future?

We can’t. We can only see possibilities. But that’s okay. We’re not trying to predict what will happen tomorrow; we’re trying to understand possible consequences. We’re trying to lay out maps of the landscape ahead, in order chart a better course. These maps won’t always be accurate — sometimes they’ll be completely wrong. But the process of creating the maps will give us a more detailed look and clearer perspective on where we are today. Even being completely wrong has value: figuring out why we were wrong, what we missed, can sometimes be even more illuminating than being right.

There’s a rapidly-growing variety of methods available to us, from scenario planning to simulations to futures-mapping to so-called “prediction markets.” Perhaps the most exciting is something new: massively-collaborative forecasting. I have the good fortune to be part of the Superstruct project, a “massively-multiplayer forecasting game;” Superstruct will begin in early October, and thousands of people will work together to explore what the future could hold.

With all of these tools, the goal is to examine tomorrow to give us a better understanding of how to deal with today.

I’ve sometimes called futures thinking a “wind-tunnel,” a way of testing plans and ideas. Now I think that’s a bit limited. Futures thinking is perhaps better understood as an immune system for our civilization. By examining and testing different possible outcomes — potential threats, emerging ideas, exciting opportunities — we strengthen our collective capacity to deal with what really does transpire. Thinking about the future, and doing so in a careful, structured, open and collaborative way, makes us a stronger civilization.

It’s at the core of how we can save the world. Focusing only the challenges of the present may seem imperative, especially when those challenges are massive and frightening. But without a sense of what’s next, a capacity for understanding connections and horizons, and a vision of what kind of world we want, our efforts to deal with today’s problems will inevitably leave us weakened, vulnerable, and blind to challenges to come.

By ignoring tomorrow, we undermine today.

         
Comments

One of the traits that makes us uniquely human is to look ahead and imagine different futures. The piece of advice that I have always found confusing is "Live each day as if it were your last". Personally, if I did that, I would have an endless string of days swamped with self-indulgence including too much chocolate. I would be fat, unhealthy and ultimately unhappy. Far better on an individual level to live each day as if it were the start of one hundred years. Ask "How will this action or non-action affect me and the world I live in for the present and for the next century?"
As indviduals, as a country, as a world, we need to change how we deal with challenges - which frankly up to now has been purely reactive. As individuals we need to live with personal accountability for next 100 years. As individual nations, we need to plan for 200 years. I think ehe world should plan for 500 years- but we are very far from some sort of futuristic citizen of earth identity.

Nice job hopefully we don't destory the world first

My hope is that we start spreading out to the stars before we destroy our world.
I think that part of our destruction scenario is that there are just too many people, too much consumption of fossil fuels, too much greed and too much "live in the moment & to hell with the future impact". We all (myself included) buy things that we want now but don't really need and put them on plastic -- not really taking into account that we are going to be paying these items off for years at usury high interest rates.

@ Flight Girl:

As one of the other articles on this website mentions, we aren't going to destroy the world anytime soon, probably not ever. We might destroy ourselves, or our society, but the Earth'll keep on keepin' on.

@ Dawntime:

Perhaps the issue with your interpretation of living as though it were your last day should indicate to you more of an issue with how you feel one's last day should be spent.

Most of your ideas and arguments presented here are only applicable for yourself and those sharing your value system. For example, the use of "too many" doesn't even say what boundary has been exceeded. There are people out there who would rather consume every ounce of oil before shifting energy sources, and in all honesty, moral arguments are moot points to many of them. A "live in the moment and to hell with the future" philosophy often is, though is may be tough to accept, just as valid (sometimes more valid in terms of logical arguments) as more philanthropic perspectives.

If you want people to follow your advice, bring more supported arguments to the table. I'd supply some here, but I've rambled enough (and there are plenty to be found just be perusing this site's archives).

These comments are correct in their statements. The only problem is conveying this notion to a group of individuals that have been brainwashed to believe that all of their troubles will be wisked away by someone at any time. This type of procrastiantion is what will keep the future from being born and the continued downward spiral back to an age, that I am sure no one wants to live in, when there was no TV, Internet or a keep it simple stupid mentality. A time when there was only the basics to worry about, food and going to work. The past is gone and only those who cherish the future will turn this decaying planet around.

Leave a comment










(Please be patient, it may take a moment for your comment to appear.)


How You Can Save The World continues below: